MM2 Trading: The Unwritten Rules of Value and Fairness
Ever wondered why some trades sail through while others hit a wall, even when values seem similar? A recent Reddit post highlights the sometimes-contradictory nature of trading in Murder Mystery 2, where player perception often dictates deal success more than raw value charts.
A recent discussion among Murder Mystery 2 players has shed light on the intriguing and sometimes bewildering world of in-game trading. It seems that even when the numbers on a value list align, the success of a trade can hinge on a player's personal interpretation of fairness and their individual trading goals.
The debate kicked off when a player recounted an attempt to intervene in what they perceived as a bad trade: someone was about to exchange a Clockwork for a Bat. In the eyes of the observer, this was a clear overpay for the Bat, suggesting an imbalance in value. However, their subsequent attempt to offer an Eternal Cane for a Nightblade—a trade they believed to be a "lowball"—was swiftly rejected by the Nightblade owner. This scenario left many scratching their heads, highlighting the subjective nature of trading often seen in MM2.
The Puzzle of Perceived Value
This incident perfectly illustrates that in MM2, numerical value lists are often just one piece of the puzzle. Players don't always adhere strictly to them, especially when it comes to coveted items or perceived unfairness. The player who was willing to accept Clockwork for Bat might have desperately wanted the Bat, or perhaps they weren't aware of its true value. Conversely, the Nightblade owner might have been very knowledgeable about their item's worth or simply wasn't interested in the Eternal Cane at that offer.
It's also worth considering the "collector
